/Who are the main CTEM solution providers right now?
The main CTEM solution providers right now are Tenable and Qualys (both Gartner Leaders in exposure assessment), XM Cyber for attack paths, CrowdStrike for endpoint-driven teams, Wiz (now part of Google Cloud) for cloud, Armis (now part of ServiceNow) for IT, OT and medical devices, CyCognito for external attack surface, Axonius for asset aggregation, and Pentera, Picus and Cymulate for validation. Seemplicity sits across the program, turning findings from all of these tools into prioritized, validated and fixed exposures. Most teams combine two or three.
If you’re trying to figure out who the main CTEM solution providers are right now, you’re not alone. Almost every security vendor now says it does “exposure management,” and the market changed a lot this year. This guide covers who the main players are, what each one is actually good at, and how to pick the right mix.
What Changed in 2026
Two big deals reshaped the CTEM landscape this year. Google closed its $32B acquisition of Wiz in March 2026, making Wiz part of Google Cloud. ServiceNow also completed its Armis acquisition, bringing IT, OT and medical device visibility into the ServiceNow platform.
If you’re shortlisting vendors, factor that in. Being owned by a platform giant can change roadmaps, pricing and how easily a tool works with products outside that company.
Who Are the Main CTEM Solution Providers Right Now? The Short Answer
Tenable and Qualys lead in exposure assessment, and XM Cyber leads in attack path analysis. CrowdStrike serves endpoint-driven teams, Wiz covers cloud, Armis covers IT and OT assets, and CyCognito covers the external attack surface. Axonius handles asset aggregation, and Pentera, Picus and Cymulate handle validation. Seemplicity sits across the program. It takes findings from all of these tools and turns them into prioritized, validated and fixed exposures. Most teams combine two or three.
What to Look For Before You Compare Vendors
Gartner’s CTEM framework has five stages: scoping, discovery, prioritization, validation and mobilization. Many platforms are strong on the first three (finding and ranking exposures) and weak on the last two (proving something is exploitable and actually getting it fixed). Before comparing features, check each platform against a short list:
- Does it cover your whole environment (cloud, on-prem, identity, OT, external attack surface) or just one slice of it?
- Does it confirm exploitability, or just flag theoretical risk?
- Does it send findings to the right owner and track them until they’re closed, or does it stop at a dashboard?
- Does it work with the tools you already run, or does it ask you to replace them?
With that in mind, here’s the full rundown.
Best CTEM Platforms 2025 2026: The Full Rundown
Best for unified exposure assessment: Tenable One
Tenable has one of the deepest vulnerability management track records in the industry. Tenable One builds on that with asset inventory, attack path analysis and unified risk scoring across IT, cloud, OT and identity. Gartner named Tenable a Leader in its first Magic Quadrant for Exposure Assessment Platforms (November 2025). It’s a good fit if you want one vendor to handle most of your discovery and prioritization work.
Best for attack path validation: XM Cyber
XM Cyber made its name in attack path management, and that shows in how it handles validation. Instead of just listing individual vulnerabilities, it maps realistic attack paths to your critical assets. That makes it a strong pick for teams that want context on what’s exploitable, not just severity scores.
Best for teams already on CrowdStrike: CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management
If you already run Falcon for endpoint detection, this uses the same agent to add exposure management. It combines vulnerability and misconfiguration data with live threat telemetry. The main appeal isn’t being the best at any one CTEM stage. It’s getting more out of a platform you already use.
Best for cloud-native environments: Wiz
Wiz approaches exposure management from the cloud outward, with strong code-to-cloud visibility across multi-cloud environments. It’s now part of Google Cloud but still supports AWS and Azure. If most of your attack surface lives in the cloud, Wiz is built for that in a way on-prem-first platforms aren’t.
Best for IT, OT and medical device visibility: Armis
Armis Centrix is known for finding assets that traditional scanners miss, like OT systems, IoT and medical devices. Now that it’s part of ServiceNow, it’s a natural choice for organizations that already run IT and security workflows in ServiceNow.
Best for external attack surface discovery: CyCognito
CyCognito finds internet-facing assets at scale without agents, including the ones organizations often don’t know they have, like forgotten subsidiaries and shadow IT. It’s a strong choice for closing the “unknown unknowns” gap in the discovery stage.
Best for teams standardized on Qualys: Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Platform
Qualys is another long-standing vulnerability management vendor that has expanded into exposure management. Its TruRisk scoring combines threat intel, asset criticality and attack paths. Qualys was also named a Leader in Gartner’s 2025 Exposure Assessment Platforms Magic Quadrant. It’s a familiar option for teams that already rely on Qualys for scanning.
Best for asset aggregation across existing tools: Axonius
Axonius started in cyber asset attack surface management (CaaSM), and that strength carries into its exposure management product. It’s excellent at building a single source of truth from dozens of existing tools. That makes it a solid foundation even if you pair it with a separate validation or remediation platform.
Best for continuous, automated validation: Pentera
Pentera automates security validation. It runs safe attacks against your own environment to confirm what’s actually exploitable. It’s a good fit for teams that want ongoing proof their controls work, not just a list of theoretical vulnerabilities.
Best for breach and attack simulation: Picus Security and Cymulate
Picus and Cymulate both run breach and attack simulation. They test whether your existing security controls actually stop the techniques real attackers use. They’re a good choice if you want to measure and tune your defenses, not just find gaps.
Best for running your whole CTEM program across the tools you already own: Seemplicity
Most of the main CTEM solution providers are strongest in one or two stages. Seemplicity connects them. It pulls findings from 100+ security tools into a single view, then normalizes and deduplicates them. Your scanners, cloud security, code security and attack surface tools all work together instead of each producing its own backlog.
From there, it covers most of the CTEM cycle:
- Prioritization: Seemplicity adds technical and business context so teams can focus on the small share of exposures that matter. It also brings in live EDR telemetry from CrowdStrike and Microsoft Defender to see whether a vulnerability is already blocked on a given asset.
- Exploitability: Its AI Analysts investigate each vulnerability’s real-world exploitability. They check runtime configuration, network reachability and code, then return an evidence-based verdict instead of a static severity score.
- Mobilization: AI maps each exposure to the right owner and routes the fix into Jira, ServiceNow or wherever that team works, with SLA tracking built in. Some fixes can be automated entirely.
- Measurement: Executive and audit-ready reporting shows whether exposure is going down, not just how many findings came in.
Seemplicity doesn’t scan for assets itself. It builds on the discovery tools you already own, so there’s nothing to replace. For teams with plenty of findings but not enough fixes, it’s one of the strongest overall choices on this list.
How to Choose from the Main CTEM Solution Providers
There’s no single “best” CTEM platform because the category isn’t one thing. A platform that’s excellent at external attack surface discovery isn’t necessarily built for validation, and a validation tool isn’t necessarily built for remediation. The strongest CTEM programs we see pair one or two discovery and validation tools with a layer that ties everything together and drives fixes.
Start by being honest about where your program is weakest. If you can’t see your attack surface, add discovery. If you can’t tell what’s actually exploitable, add validation. If you have findings from five tools and they still take months to fix, your gap isn’t visibility. It’s action, and that’s the layer to fix first.
Already running a few of these tools? See how Seemplicity turns their findings into fixes.
Stay updated on Seemplicity blog
Subscribe today to stay informed and get regular updates from Seemplicity.





